Look Who’s on Twitter!

April 11, 2009 at 4:11 pm | In Entertainment, Media, New Media, journalism | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

The Twitter Brower: flowingdata.com

 

Obama is on it, so is Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore, Vanessa Hudgens, Ryan Seacrest, Tina Fey, Robert Pattinson and a lot of other important and less important people.  Who needs paparazzi to tell us what celebs are up to when they can do it themselves in 140 characters or less at that. When Shakespeare said ‘Brevity is the soul of wit’, You know now he was talking about Twitter, the micro-blogging service where you can find people posting updates, networking, promoting, looking for jobs, getting fired from jobs and having fun sometimes. There are even fictional characters like Shawn Spencer from USA’s Psych twittering online.  

I joined Twitter many months ago out of sheer curiosity and then let my account gather dust. It seemed so silly to keep posting updates about what I am doing to a bunch of strangers. But in a vague moment of boredom a few weeks ago, I made a post and pretty soon, I realized I liked it. Now I make an average of three posts a day sometimes two in ten minutes. I think for the first time, I would stick to a social networking site after the initial enthusiasm wears off. 

My past experiences with the social networking scene have not impressed me to the degree, where I could think of it the way a lot of journalists do. Orkut was fun till it got mildly creepy with pretty much anyone and everyone wanting to be your friend for no visible reason. The ‘frandship’ requests alone were enough for me to renounce my account with little regret. Plus I’d found Facebook by then and it seemed like a classier and more private alternative to being on Orkut. But then it became so over loaded with features, that you dreaded logging in, lest someone had challenged you to  some inane game  or quiz that didn’t make sense to begin with. It’s become the legitimate spam portal where anyone can push anything into your face.  The only reason I am still on it is because I love my friends and I have to find some way of keeping in touch with them.  Plus it’s sort of uncool not to be on it, even if I check my account like say once in three months.

Twitter is like the ultimate no frills Facebook. It is less complex, more creative and definitely cooler.  It’s fun to think of the mundane daily activities in the form of witty, staccato sentences, and I think that’s really what people enjoy a lot more than the connectivity. Co-founder of Twitter, Biz Stone was on The Colbert Report the other night, and he said “Twitter is like the messaging service, we didn’t know we needed.”  I have to agree, since it is exactly the kind of messaging service I’ve been looking for. Free, fast and done through a key board.

More than the technical features of Twitter, it is the social dynamic which is more interesting.  Why do we take so much trouble to worry about our privacy and then write about what time we got up or where we’re gonna go for dinner? It’s almost like most of the time; we’re trying to make our lives appear more interesting than it actually is or just making a performance out of things, because there is a hypothetical audience out there for it, reading about us. 

It’s probably the reason why there are so many celebrities on Twitter, after years of telling the media to leave them alone that too. Biz Stone says its because Twitter is a simple and quick way of controlling information about yourself and that’s why it attracts so much Hollywood traffic. Plus it also acts like an improvisation of word-of mouth in a way, allowing you to promote stuff as well and create a closer bond with the fans.  My Space and Blogs require a different kind of structure of information and moderation which they may not have the time or inclination for.

Micro blogging has been around for some time now and Twitter takes it to a whole new level by bridging it with cell phone activity and that’s probably appealing to a lot of users, given the number of special applications cell phones have come up with to facilitate Twitter on cell phones.  Android came up with Twitteroid. Adobe has come up with TweetDeck to bridge Twitter with Facebook, a web application that I am trying out right now and liking.

I don’t know whether to get too excited about it all, because a lot of good things on the web have taken a turn for the worse, simply because they became too popular for their own good. I hope the same doesn’t happen with Twitter.

 

 

 

 

 

How Technology can Breed Complacency

March 31, 2009 at 9:20 pm | In Media, New Media, journalism | 1 Comment

Posted for the TNTJ  March Debate on what traditional skills are we losing?

For some time now, new media has been heralded as the second coming of journalism worldwide. Everybody marvels at RSS news feeds and tweets and blogs, and celebrates the slow death of the newspaper. While this immense explosion of web journalism is something that is phenomenal for many reasons, it has its pitfalls.

One of the primary issues with new media journalism is credibility. Even as more and more people are turning to the web for independent news and commentary, the question of credibility does give them pause. Who is this random blogger who reports from his or her community and why should I take his/her word?

It’s a shortcoming that web journalists have been trying hard to overcome, and have succeeded partially. Perhaps the fact that bloggers are getting more recognition as good journalists will help the case.

In a way it’s related to the loss of a few traditional news gathering skills. The technology available to journalists have led them to circumvent any real field work, or face to face interaction. While this is completely justified given the short deadlines they work under, its given rise to a lot of surface scratching and incomplete research, where we’re only as knowledgeable on a subject as Google allows us to be.

The visible amount of carelessness that creeps into a lot of writing on the web in terms of typos, incorrect or lack of attribution, grammar and rudimentary editing is another reason why web journalism lacks the kind of credibility that print or television enjoy. Good and accurate writing is not as dismissible as many think just because it’s on the web. It’s a serious issue which bloggers should ideally take note of and pay attention to.

The Lands of Perpetual Recession

March 29, 2009 at 1:19 pm | In Development, Issues, Society, journalism | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Sangham Meeting in which the wekly finances get discussed

A Sangham Meeting in which the weekly finances get discussed

 

  
It’s recession; people are losing jobs and crunching on their expenses. That means no more eating out two days a week or putting off buying some random new shiny that you saw last week. Why because it’s what you’re supposed to do. Thank the stars you’re still in school, so you don’t have to worry about losing a job maybe only finding one after it gets over. For now you’re safe, safe enough to write about things like this than worrying about your next meal.

 

 

 

 

But what if your entire life was to be spent in recession. Waiting it out and waiting to die are one and the same thing and deprivation takes on a whole new level.  That’s unfathomable really. It’ll blow over right. Those large financial corporations and banks will get things up and running in no time. They’ve screwed up before, they’ll fix it as well. It’s why we give them our money, our future hopes and dreams, that house we want to buy and the car that comes with it.

In the arid lands of Medak in  India,  rural  uneducated women are doing the same thing. Every week they turn over their hard earned and microscopic savings to people who they believe will take care of it for them. Who will open savings accounts for them in the nearby post offices and give them the financial skills to operate it. For these women, these savings are not about a swanking new SUV. It’s about escaping generations of debt that has pushed them into years of wage labour without a better future in sight. It’s about being able to free their tiny areas of mortgaged land so that they have something to leave for their children.

Rural poverty is something we can all pretend to understand. It’s all about using the right words, the sympathetic gestures and the apt amount of   righteous indignation. But it really startles you when you confront it face to face and you find yourself not sympathising so much as grappling with the sheer deprivation that exists in the heartlands of every country.  These are the people that globalization and the bandwagon that goes with it missed out on. Yet they bear the costs without a tangible benefit in sight. Their village water resources are bled dry to fuel cola company plants for urban consumers. They’re the ones left hanging dry when IMF reforms force states to rollback on their aid, so that capital can flow into the cities and give them the much desired structures of glass and steel.

Travelling across the Medak region of  Andhra Pradesh in India about 170 km from the capital and IT hub of Hyderabad, I met many women who come under what is understood as the ultra-poor category which as defined by the World Bank includes people who earn less than  1 US $ a day.  These women are part of the pilot ultra-poor programme started by the SKS foundation, the NGO wing of SKS one of the largest micro finance institutions in the country.

Operating from Narayankhed in Andhra Pradesh, it covers four hundred odd families across a hundred villages in the region.  Under this program, single women who are the only earning members of their family without any financial assets such as property or live stock are given grants to acquire an asset like a buffalo or a goat to supplement their income from farm labour which gets them around Rs. 40 a day ($0.791) for 15 days in a month. 

Using the livestock for milk or labour assures them a secondary source of income and a minimal saving that ranges from Rs.10 ( $ 0.198) to Rs 50 ( $ 0.988) a week. They deposit these savings with a field assistant from SKS who records their weekly income and expenditure and advises them on health and financial decision making. It’s a two year intervention which is due to end in a few months following which the women would ideally have two sources of income and saving capacity that could improve their standard of living.

A house visit in progress

A house visit in progress

 

 

Talking to these women is an enriching experience. They open up easily, ready to pour their troubles to anyone who’ll listen. They’re not necessarily looking for any help, only someone who’ll patiently listen. It’s a common lament across thee three villages I travel to. Summer is a particularly tough time, as the cattle don’t yield a lot of milk and there is a dearth of employment in the farms. At these times, they get by on reserve stock of food grains from last year and manage to make ends meet by selling stone from residual quarrying, gathering and selling firewood or collecting leftover harvest from threshing.

 

Meeting these women leads me to believe, how wrong our approach can sometimes be. To understand them as hapless and oppressed in our romantic imagination of third world poverty, without any agency of their own is a great disservice to them even if our hearts should be in the right place. They’re strong and resilient people who try and make better existences for themselves and their families even when the odds are heavily against them. Even in the face of the heart wrenching poverty that they face, I find it difficult to pity them or feel sorry for them because they’re so full of grit and determination to change their lives for the better.

 

It also leads me to think why financial capitalism has no place for people like these. If it did, we probably wouldn’t be facing this colossal economic bust. A lot of micro-credit and finance  studies have shown that while the largest of corporations default on  millions of dollars of debt that get written off year after year by  banks and firms, the poor are often much more dependable and low risk clients who pay up their loans with efficiency. Why then can’t they be offered financial services suited to their needs that can make all the difference to their basic existence? They may not understand or care about mutual funds or stock markets, but it’s a pretty safe bet that they understand the value of money more than anybody else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intelligible Television

December 5, 2008 at 12:11 am | In Entertainment, Media, Shows, Television, journalism | 1 Comment

Hey, here I go again.  Starting one more of my famous segments. I know it’s a little weird that I keep doing that given that there are no comments to show anybody is reading what I write.  But then, you know… Blogs are anyway about seeking attention, or so I read in The Hindu once.

So I watch a lot of television, and I mean a lot. But the thing is, Its not really on TV as such.  Its largely American shows that I download from the internet. I kinda gave up on Indian TV a long time ago. Right about the time, I started college and went to stay at a hostel. Having no TV of your own, forces you to resort to finding other means of entertainment. The momentous discovery of utorrent has probably been the most defining point of my life. Given the sacharine dipped, melodramatic fare that is served to you on Star Plus and Sony, I think I made the right choice in switching loyalties to ABC, CW, CBS, NBC and Fox. Call me unpatriotic, snobbish, west -obsessed, or whatever. I think a selected and emphasis on selected here, portion of American primetime programming is really phenomenal compared to the staggering, repeat motion sequences of our soaps and reality shows.

For one, these shows are seasonal and weekly. You don’t need to agonize over missing a day or sit glued to the television all year long. Secondly, they actually have something of a plotline, not just families in over-the-top clothing, sitting in their living rooms and talking about themselves. They also have more genres of programming. Not everything is a love story or a family soap. There are investigative series, teenage dramas, sitcoms, variety shows, comedies and such.

So given the obvious advantages and my own aversion to soppy content, I have now regularly timed myself with the fall season of the US. Ask me about season premieres, returning series, hiatus, holiday specials, cancellations and I can tell you exactly what they mean. Ask me who’s playing Tulsi on Kyunki.. I won’t have a clue.

So here’s a list of the shows I watch- Desperate Housewives, Fringe, Priveleged, The Big Bang Theory, How I met your Mother, Bones, Psych, The Colbert Report, Saturday Night live and 30 Rock.  So here’s what I am going to do henceforth. Taking inspiration from some of my favourite television blogs like RTVW and TV aholic , I am going to try and do some reviews and commentary on these shows. While part of it will be as proffesional as I’ve learnt from three and half years of journalism, sometimes I’ll just engage in some feel-good gushing.

So watch out this space in case you’re looking for any help in deciding your schedule.

New media is the place to be

October 19, 2008 at 2:28 pm | In Media, New Media, journalism | 1 Comment
Tags: , , ,

What would my ideal journalism job be? The question takes me back to elementary school composition exercises. What do you want to be when you grow up? I pretty much knew I wanted to be a journalist for most of my life. There was a period when I thought I wanted to venture into genetics or architecture but my less than stellar aptitude in Science, Physics and Math pretty much negated those options.

 

I never gave much thought about what kind of journalism I wanted to pursue till a few years ago. If you’re English educated in India, the only place you can be is in the national press. For those who get their liberal higher education in the metros of the nation, writing in local vernacular papers or magazines is unthinkable. It’s not something we do. So we slog away in colleges and journalism schools hoping to say someday that I am from Times of India or The Hindu or some other equally illustrious metro based national daily which is read by about 3-4% of the country. The phenomenal growth of 24×7 news channels in India in all the Indian languages and especially in English and Hindi changed to a great degree. Aspiring journalists switched their preferences over to television which is currently, more prominent and better paying. Not me though. I can’t think of a job in television. It’s repetitive, highly monotonous and limits creativity.

 

Like most aspiring journalists, I do have the one paper or magazine I absolutely must work for before I die and that is The Hindu one of the finest newspapers in the country. But it doesn’t have to be a long gig; a brief internship stint would be just fine. I want to be on the inside of a newspaper that I love and admire and see why they are the way they are. If I could stretch my imagination and my capabilities, I guess being part of the foreign correspondence bureau of The Hindu would be awesome. 

 

On a more long term basis, I think web journalism is where I truly want to be. Like most people of my generation, I think New Media is where the future lies. It’s nascent and not institutionalized in the way print or television has been. That is what makes it so much more exciting to work with. It’s a chance for one to change traditional ideas about how journalism should be. To break down the old understandings about news value or narratives, to maybe invent new ones. My ideal job would be having my own website with maybe a small scale staff and finding that middle path between news and feature writing .To achieve the balance between hard hitting stuff and infotainment like Salon.

 

But on the whole, it’s not something I plan on doing right after college. Ideal jobs are ideal when you get them at a stage in your life when you feel you’re ready. Before that you must pay your dues, gather experience, take what comes your way and branch out into different fields before settling where you think you belong. I believe that any job in journalism has a lot to teach us – about good and bad content, about principles, about realizing what we’re good at and zoning into what we really want to be doing. To be steadfast to an immature dream that we chart out at 16 or 18 and not let the profession change us for the better is a great disservice we do to ourselves. We shouldn’t be putting up with a job but rather try and enjoy it , do our best with it and take from it whatever we can to something better as when the opportunities come along. 

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.