Look Who’s on Twitter!

April 11, 2009 at 4:11 pm | In Entertainment, Media, New Media, journalism | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

The Twitter Brower: flowingdata.com

 

Obama is on it, so is Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore, Vanessa Hudgens, Ryan Seacrest, Tina Fey, Robert Pattinson and a lot of other important and less important people.  Who needs paparazzi to tell us what celebs are up to when they can do it themselves in 140 characters or less at that. When Shakespeare said ‘Brevity is the soul of wit’, You know now he was talking about Twitter, the micro-blogging service where you can find people posting updates, networking, promoting, looking for jobs, getting fired from jobs and having fun sometimes. There are even fictional characters like Shawn Spencer from USA’s Psych twittering online.  

I joined Twitter many months ago out of sheer curiosity and then let my account gather dust. It seemed so silly to keep posting updates about what I am doing to a bunch of strangers. But in a vague moment of boredom a few weeks ago, I made a post and pretty soon, I realized I liked it. Now I make an average of three posts a day sometimes two in ten minutes. I think for the first time, I would stick to a social networking site after the initial enthusiasm wears off. 

My past experiences with the social networking scene have not impressed me to the degree, where I could think of it the way a lot of journalists do. Orkut was fun till it got mildly creepy with pretty much anyone and everyone wanting to be your friend for no visible reason. The ‘frandship’ requests alone were enough for me to renounce my account with little regret. Plus I’d found Facebook by then and it seemed like a classier and more private alternative to being on Orkut. But then it became so over loaded with features, that you dreaded logging in, lest someone had challenged you to  some inane game  or quiz that didn’t make sense to begin with. It’s become the legitimate spam portal where anyone can push anything into your face.  The only reason I am still on it is because I love my friends and I have to find some way of keeping in touch with them.  Plus it’s sort of uncool not to be on it, even if I check my account like say once in three months.

Twitter is like the ultimate no frills Facebook. It is less complex, more creative and definitely cooler.  It’s fun to think of the mundane daily activities in the form of witty, staccato sentences, and I think that’s really what people enjoy a lot more than the connectivity. Co-founder of Twitter, Biz Stone was on The Colbert Report the other night, and he said “Twitter is like the messaging service, we didn’t know we needed.”  I have to agree, since it is exactly the kind of messaging service I’ve been looking for. Free, fast and done through a key board.

More than the technical features of Twitter, it is the social dynamic which is more interesting.  Why do we take so much trouble to worry about our privacy and then write about what time we got up or where we’re gonna go for dinner? It’s almost like most of the time; we’re trying to make our lives appear more interesting than it actually is or just making a performance out of things, because there is a hypothetical audience out there for it, reading about us. 

It’s probably the reason why there are so many celebrities on Twitter, after years of telling the media to leave them alone that too. Biz Stone says its because Twitter is a simple and quick way of controlling information about yourself and that’s why it attracts so much Hollywood traffic. Plus it also acts like an improvisation of word-of mouth in a way, allowing you to promote stuff as well and create a closer bond with the fans.  My Space and Blogs require a different kind of structure of information and moderation which they may not have the time or inclination for.

Micro blogging has been around for some time now and Twitter takes it to a whole new level by bridging it with cell phone activity and that’s probably appealing to a lot of users, given the number of special applications cell phones have come up with to facilitate Twitter on cell phones.  Android came up with Twitteroid. Adobe has come up with TweetDeck to bridge Twitter with Facebook, a web application that I am trying out right now and liking.

I don’t know whether to get too excited about it all, because a lot of good things on the web have taken a turn for the worse, simply because they became too popular for their own good. I hope the same doesn’t happen with Twitter.

 

 

 

 

 

How Technology can Breed Complacency

March 31, 2009 at 9:20 pm | In Media, New Media, journalism | 1 Comment

Posted for the TNTJ  March Debate on what traditional skills are we losing?

For some time now, new media has been heralded as the second coming of journalism worldwide. Everybody marvels at RSS news feeds and tweets and blogs, and celebrates the slow death of the newspaper. While this immense explosion of web journalism is something that is phenomenal for many reasons, it has its pitfalls.

One of the primary issues with new media journalism is credibility. Even as more and more people are turning to the web for independent news and commentary, the question of credibility does give them pause. Who is this random blogger who reports from his or her community and why should I take his/her word?

It’s a shortcoming that web journalists have been trying hard to overcome, and have succeeded partially. Perhaps the fact that bloggers are getting more recognition as good journalists will help the case.

In a way it’s related to the loss of a few traditional news gathering skills. The technology available to journalists have led them to circumvent any real field work, or face to face interaction. While this is completely justified given the short deadlines they work under, its given rise to a lot of surface scratching and incomplete research, where we’re only as knowledgeable on a subject as Google allows us to be.

The visible amount of carelessness that creeps into a lot of writing on the web in terms of typos, incorrect or lack of attribution, grammar and rudimentary editing is another reason why web journalism lacks the kind of credibility that print or television enjoy. Good and accurate writing is not as dismissible as many think just because it’s on the web. It’s a serious issue which bloggers should ideally take note of and pay attention to.

New media is the place to be

October 19, 2008 at 2:28 pm | In Media, New Media, journalism | 1 Comment
Tags: , , ,

What would my ideal journalism job be? The question takes me back to elementary school composition exercises. What do you want to be when you grow up? I pretty much knew I wanted to be a journalist for most of my life. There was a period when I thought I wanted to venture into genetics or architecture but my less than stellar aptitude in Science, Physics and Math pretty much negated those options.

 

I never gave much thought about what kind of journalism I wanted to pursue till a few years ago. If you’re English educated in India, the only place you can be is in the national press. For those who get their liberal higher education in the metros of the nation, writing in local vernacular papers or magazines is unthinkable. It’s not something we do. So we slog away in colleges and journalism schools hoping to say someday that I am from Times of India or The Hindu or some other equally illustrious metro based national daily which is read by about 3-4% of the country. The phenomenal growth of 24×7 news channels in India in all the Indian languages and especially in English and Hindi changed to a great degree. Aspiring journalists switched their preferences over to television which is currently, more prominent and better paying. Not me though. I can’t think of a job in television. It’s repetitive, highly monotonous and limits creativity.

 

Like most aspiring journalists, I do have the one paper or magazine I absolutely must work for before I die and that is The Hindu one of the finest newspapers in the country. But it doesn’t have to be a long gig; a brief internship stint would be just fine. I want to be on the inside of a newspaper that I love and admire and see why they are the way they are. If I could stretch my imagination and my capabilities, I guess being part of the foreign correspondence bureau of The Hindu would be awesome. 

 

On a more long term basis, I think web journalism is where I truly want to be. Like most people of my generation, I think New Media is where the future lies. It’s nascent and not institutionalized in the way print or television has been. That is what makes it so much more exciting to work with. It’s a chance for one to change traditional ideas about how journalism should be. To break down the old understandings about news value or narratives, to maybe invent new ones. My ideal job would be having my own website with maybe a small scale staff and finding that middle path between news and feature writing .To achieve the balance between hard hitting stuff and infotainment like Salon.

 

But on the whole, it’s not something I plan on doing right after college. Ideal jobs are ideal when you get them at a stage in your life when you feel you’re ready. Before that you must pay your dues, gather experience, take what comes your way and branch out into different fields before settling where you think you belong. I believe that any job in journalism has a lot to teach us – about good and bad content, about principles, about realizing what we’re good at and zoning into what we really want to be doing. To be steadfast to an immature dream that we chart out at 16 or 18 and not let the profession change us for the better is a great disservice we do to ourselves. We shouldn’t be putting up with a job but rather try and enjoy it , do our best with it and take from it whatever we can to something better as when the opportunities come along. 

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.