Talking Movies: Vintage Celluloid
August 9, 2009 at 5:39 pm | In Entertainment, Society, Talking Movies, Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: audience, depression, hollywood, Jeff Daniels, Mia Farrow, movie, Purple Rose of Cairo, Woody Allen

Purple Rose of Cairo: Blurring the lines betwen fiction and life
‘The Purple Rose of Cairo’ has got to be one of the charming movies I’ve ever come across. It’s quaint flow and child-like simplicity can easily lull us into thinking of it like yet another romantic comedy. But ‘Purple Rose…’ is much like a warm breeze, that floats about unobtrusively and yet you can’t feel unaffected by it.
Directed by Woody Allen in a deceptively simple and comedic narrative, the movies tells the story of Cecilia played by Mia Farrow, a working class woman in an unhappy and abusive marriage who finds respite from the depression and grueling life in the glamorous movies that she watches every week at the local theatre. The more real life presses upon her, the more she escapes into the soothing darkness of talkies. It is during her fifth viewing of ‘The Purple Rose of Cairo’ that a character from the movie Tom played by Jeff Daniels jumps out of the movie screen claiming to have fallen in love with her. While panic ensues all around, Cecilia spends a day out of the dreams with Tom. Meanwhile, Gil Sheppard, the actor who plays the character of Tom runs into Cecilia in the hopes of finding his errant on-screen alter ego and bringing him back. An odd love triangle follows with both the actor and the character having fallen for her forcing Cecilia to choose while having to contend with her irate husband ( Danny Aiello)
‘The Purple Rose of Cairo’ explores some interesting themes. It breaks the fourth wall both ways by having Tom travel into the real world and also Cecilia going into the movie. The other characters in the movies, find themselves lost without the presence of Tom and the momentum of the script to keep them going. They end up arguing with the audience, jumping into each other’s scenes and going off-page. The movie made in 1985 is set in the era of the depression. The starkness of the country and Cecilia’s own conditions forms a bleak contrast to the glamorous movies that she likes to lose herself in. This lends a bitter-sweet tone to the movie where while one is amused at the premise of the storyline it becomes evident that it isn’t quite a fairy tale romance. This further gets elucidated in the way that Tom fails to understand real world problems like lack of money or jobs.
The perfection of cinema that is seen on screen is juxtaposed with the selfish and egoistic side of Hollywood. Tom, the on-screen character is sweet, considerate and devoted to Cecelia while the actor who plays him is self-absorbed and arrogant. Even though he’s perfect for her, Tom’s naivety leads Cecilia to choose Gil Sheppard on account that he was from the real world. A choice she regrets in the end when she leaves home to go away to Hollywood with him only to find he’s left without her. The climax finds Cecilia alone in the theatre watching yet another movie after which she would most likely return to her abusive husband.
Talking Movies: The Dark Knight- To Understand the Reason of Unreason
March 14, 2009 at 3:50 pm | In Talking Movies | Leave a CommentTags: Aaron Eckhart, Batman, Christian Bale, Dark Kinght, Film noir, Heath Ledger, IMAX, The Dark Knight, The Joker

Heath Ledger as The Joker in The Dark Knight
So, I finally caught ’The Dark Knight’ after letting it sit on my PC forever, and boy was I glad I did. The sheer brilliance of the movie blew me apart and then reassembled me. Talk about justice, righteousness and dubious morality of the so called ‘civilized’. Poignant questions that a mad man poses to the outlaw vigilante.
I know you’re supposed to watch such movies for the cool effects and the IMAX camera work and of course Batman. But enough had been said on those things already and I am not really into the whole superhero mania. Batman’s dark aura and visible moral ambiguity make for the perfect Film noir and it shows in the grey and black tones and the gravelly voice. Literally and figuratively speaking, The Joker makes a splash of colour with only his bizarreness and turns Bruce Wayne’s monochromatic world upside down and inside out.
‘The Dark Knight’ raises a lot of questions on issues of control and rules. The Joker mocks the convenience of people’s goodness and their will to be upright citizens as and when the occasion is conducive to such behaviour. When the rules are off, he demonstrates how easily they can shed the trappings of morality and altruistic humanity to look out for themselves.
Heath Ledger has really given the world his best work as the Joker, who hides behind the mask of dark humour and unleashes anarchy, refusing to abide by the dictates of logic or plan. His argument about how the worst forms of cruelty go unquestioned simply because they can be justified on grounds of public interest makes us pause and think.
Aaron Eckhart also impresses. Both as Harvey Dent, the righteous DA of the mythical Gotham City and as Two-Face, the reckless, revenge driven villain who seeks his vengeance on those who’ve wronged him using flipism i.e. (an ostensible normative practise of making decision by flipping a coin). He exhibits the futility of trying to be good in a flawed system. A philosophy which is similar to that of Batman himself who works outside of law, to help uphold it. Christian Bale does an admirable job of portryaing the flawed but larger than life Batman, who struggles with the collateral damages his actions cause.
To watch this film simply as a superhero cult movie would be a great injustice to it. Even if it does have predictable resolution, it speaks of larger ideas- of the rationality that lies underneath madness, and the fragility of human morality.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.