Penmanship Nostalgia

September 13, 2009 at 1:04 pm | In Uncategorized | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,

I was at the supermarket the other day when I saw this selection of stationery. My attention almost immediately drawn towards a stack of pretty notebooks.  I instantly picked up one that I liked and added it to my cart. The thought that I do very little actual writing didn’t stop me for a second. 

I don’t keep diaries. But I do write in notebooks. I buy very expensive ones too. Beautifully illustrated, hard back ones for even unsentimental activities like taking class notes or noting down random things. The actual process of picking up a pen and writing on crisp, perforated sheets fills me with the kind of satisfaction that no amount of tapping away on a key board does. Even when I take notes in class, I think of my writing as more than just jotting down. I write in full sentences given that I have an unusual hatred for short forms. I compose lines on the spot and write down everything in detail, page after page of verbose paragraphs, crafted with a lot more thought than they merit for later revision. My notes read more like essays and I never understand why I do it. Just that I have to. If I am not in the mood, I’d rather not take notes than suffer the abomination of noting down bullets or keywords. A sprinkling of words across a sparse landscape that seem to serve no purpose.

Handwriting is an extremely organic process. It’s stimulating, beautiful and spontaneous. It’s something you do for yourself. Typing on the other hand is deliberate and organized. It’ll never quite feel so artistic. It doesn’t even feel sexy. Compare the gentle and furious  movement of your fingers as they sweep and stroke in royal blue ink on an expanse of white and black as words seem to flow right from your brain to your finger tips, to the mechanical and monotonous typing sounds your fingers make as you stare away impassively at a screen.

Where’s the romance in something like that? The nostalgia, the art. The expectation that when you should revisit those writings, time would have faded the ink and the pages and made them that much more precious. Instead they’ll forever stare at you in brilliant LCD black, fresh as the day you keyed them in. Always perfect and flawless, hiding behind the even indents and the spaces, the scratches that you made or the words that you over wrote which will never be seen by anyone.  Its almost impossible to be confronted with a mental block while writing, almost like my hands would move of their own accord not over thinking the purpose of each word.

Sometimes when one gets tired of all the texting and the tweeting and the typing, there is something to be said for the quiet act of writing by hand. To hold in my hands the   product of my labour afterwards, so tangible and tactile.  But modern life demands conformism.  For the perfect lines and the clear, computer generated fonts. It doesn’t see the poetry of calligraphy. It settles for the dispassion of calculated typing because it doesn’t want to see the crudeness of spontaneous scrawls and repeated striking out of words and sentences that hide in their indecipherable quality- the passion that is the reason of their existence.  

Intelligible Television: Psych and the Yips

September 12, 2009 at 4:35 pm | In Uncategorized | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Shawn gets the Yips
Shawn gets the Yips

This episode is a perfect example of when Psych accomplishes the fine balance between keeping it funny and dabbling with some heavy stuff. ‘Shawn has the Yips’ is well written and well shot with an uncanny ability to jump from funny moment to a serious one seamlessly.

In this episode, Shawn ( James Roday) tries to convince everyone after a shoot out at a local bar that it’s an assassination attempt on one of them. The target as it turns out is Lassiter( Tim Omundson). Investigating the case Shawn and Gus (Dule Hill) team up with Juliet (Maggie Lawson)  looking through past cases to find the shooter, while Lassie sulks under protection before the bad guy is finally found.  Hilarity and dramatic moments  unfold as Buzz  loses his eyebrow in a blast, Lassiter crashes his car and shoots an already dead guy and we learn some disturbing facts about Juliet’s gym routine.

This episode is a rare treat because it provides equal space to the entire cast. Everybody gets to play except for Shawn of course, who tries to deal with his hilarious mental block (thus the Yips in the title) of being unable to throw a proper catch even as he pieces the puzzle together. Lassiter gets his moments in the episode and all of them are great. Not only does he get to shoot two guns in classic action movie style, he also gets to display the rare sensitive side of his personality as he tries to  to a revenge driven father who turns out to be the one trying to kill him.

Funny moments that stand out include Shawn’s frantic elliptical workout fuelled by a fear that the machine is rigged to blow up should his heart beat rate come down. Only later does he found out, that the note was not a death threat but a ‘motivation’ tool left for him by Juliet. The whole elliptical version of ‘Speed’ is by far the most comical scene in the episode. I was also very happy to see Juliet’s character  finally get more of a role.

Let’s Talk About Weight: A Crisis of Over-Righteousness

September 7, 2009 at 12:57 am | In Health and Well Being, Issues, Popular Culture, Society, Uncategorized | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Try and broach a conversation about food and fitness. Its like chanting to the open skies and begging them to run you down you with a torrential storm.  To the average human with the average sense of ethics, its like standing in the middle of an Aladdin like bazaar, where people are shouting at you from all corners, urging you to buy their point of view.  Everybody’s showing you their stats, coming up with ostensibly solid arguments and telling you what the right line of thinking is, and also with no pretence of subtlety pointing out that you’re an idiot if you’re actually going to consider the other side of it.

  Trying to make sense of any of it and arrive at your point of view is a difficult task. There’s every conceivable shade of argument thrown into the mix and your head will probably hurt by the end of it. It’s the worst time to be objective and the temptation to go with the one that’s the glossiest or vouched for by Oprah is strong. But being a no-fun, rational person is a curse apparently.

   There are simply too many conflicting ideas about fitness and food for anyone to not have an opinion. I happen to have one. Its not the most scientific, or the most politically correct or the most extreme, but its what it is. It works for me and I plan on keeping it that way. 

   Its presumptuous to think that one person’s experience can be used to generalize for everybody. But I also think, there are a lot of people like me out there, who’re tired of figuring their place out in this web of opinions. I think at this point, I am finally ready to stop figuring it out and letting it be.

    The fat acceptance movement is not something I necessarily agree with in its entirety. But it’s a very progressive and much needed bent of thinking to the question of obesity and weight .Before you can ask, no I am not obese or overweight or plus sized. I’ve never been any of those things anytime in my life. So you’re right, I‘ll never understand completely the frustrations and the agony of someone who is. I don’t get it because I don’t get shunned, or judged or sniggered or frowned upon by the shallow and the plastic. I don’t have to settle for baggy, biscuit colored shirts because I can’t a find a size that fits me in anything remotely fashionable or flattering. But that doesn’t make me blind to the fact that it happens. It doesn’t make me ignorant of the shocking levels of unrealism and cruelty that gets pushed into our faces in the name of beauty. Fat is not the same as unhealthy always and health is not simply about thin curves and its time we understand that.

     But having said that I also wish to point out that being thin or wanting to be thin doesn’t always make you stupid or insecure or shallow or neurotic. Its something that a few proponents of this thinking seem to unfairly assume. Add some leftist feminism to the mix, and you’re suddenly this poor, empty headed girl hopped up on diet pills and fed on diet book propaganda, failing to see how the big bad pharmaceutical companies are just preying upon your weak, gullible mind by publishing pages after pages of dubious info on the lethalness of over weight. But how can you possibly understand that? Your judgment is already clouded by your insecurities that stem from the skinny and the evil fashionistas always tsk tsking at you for looking the way you do.

    My respect to the feminists (I’m almost one of you, if it weren’t for your whole no bra rule because no way in hell am I furthering gravity’s assault on my breasts) But sometimes they really underestimate their own kind. The obesity myth is a big economic conspiracy. No shit! I would never be able to see through that had that not been pointed out to me, because I couldn’t even for argument’s sake be a thinking individual right?

   Give us a little more credit than that please. Its not like one doesn’t catch up with that little fact. I understand that and plenty more. Like the fact that the sugar and wheat lobbies exercise enormous amounts of control over government policies that try to promote healthy eating. How’s that for a little economic agenda of the corporate machine? Do I sound like a desperate person willing to clutch at anything to prove my point?  Maybe I do, but I what I am trying to say is that it works both ways and we should be way past gasping over how profit drives everything by now. Of course it does. Marx told us that two centuries ago remember.

     The question is do you see and understand all of it and then make your choice? Why can it never be that a woman chooses to get thin because it’s the choice she makes? If there’s nothing wrong with being fat, why should there be anything wrong with being thin or aspiring towards it?

     I don’t buy any diet book or video that comes my way and I have never followed any celebrity regime or believed any fads. But that doesn’t stop me from watching what I eat, or counting my calories or staying away from junk food. It doesn’t stop me from working out everyday or losing the extra weight when I gain it. It also doesn’t automatically make me a self-tortured, borderline eating disorder case. I’ve read up on a lot of diverse, sensible literature and worked with a lot of different routines before I narrowed down on something that worked for me in terms of what I eat and how I burn it. I want to keep my figure and I work hard towards it. I love the fact that my arms are shapely from all those weights or that my curves are tight from crunches. I happen to like the fact that I can wear skinny jeans and that they look good on my legs.

       I’ve been a vegetarian way before it became popular and the term Vegan was simply a superhero name you’d assume in games. Generations before me in my family have been vegetarian. It’s the way I was raised and it had nothing to do with animal cruelty or carbon emissions though I am glad it serves that purpose too. The reasons were religious and mostly logistical. Nobody eats meat in my family except my dad who enjoys it occasionally. Its never cooked or brought home. I tried it my childhood, decided I didn’t like it and have never since tried again to eat it. Recently, I’ve begun to read up quite a lot on the vegan and the raw food movement and incorporate some of the things that I like into my own diet. I’ve never asked anyone to give meat up or espoused vegetarianism as a healthier alternative. I don’t eat any sugar or butter and generally stay away from sweet and creamy things. But I’ve never asked anyone to do the same.

       However,  I am not going to think its okay to indulge in fatty foods heavily and celebrate that as some misguided tenet of fat acceptance which its not. It’s a stupid and unhealthy way of living and it’s a stupid argument to make.  It’s also a little self-delusional. For all the agenda driven, pharmaceutical sponsored, ‘thinspirational’ media, there is also a significant amount of credible data that tells us respectfully and with consideration, that we can’t treat our bodies like a dumping ground for anything. We can’t deny that certain eating and lifestyle practices are unhealthy and need to be changed. It’s what’s good for us, and the environment. It’s very detrimental to hide behind a progressive thought process and deny that there’s anything wrong with the choices we’re making. It’s also a little childish to point fingers at all those who make the right choices and tell them they’re skinny bitches or bimbos who are being sucked into a trap of artificial beauty.

     I am not making any claims to being self-assured or comfortable in my skin. There are very many times when I don’t. I get insecure all the time. I can constantly obsess over my weight, and feel ugly when I look in the mirror. But its harmless for the most part. It doesn’t mean I’ll spiral into anorexia or value all my life’s worth over my BMI. It simply means that I care, probably a lot more than the carefree person who’ll eat guilt free and a lot less than someone who will starve themselves to get that weight off. I doubt there’s any such thing as an actual healthy body image. You can be a size zero or a plus size and there’s a good chance you’re both worried that your thighs are too big. The only thing that you need to ask yourself is how large is that anxiety. Is it big enough for you to ruin your life and lose all sense of your self or is it just the right amount of motivation to live active and eat healthy?

Intelligible Television: Holy Psych! Was that a good episode or what?

August 30, 2009 at 12:22 pm | In Entertainment, Intelligible Television, Shows, Television, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
              
2s9dnpl
Psych does an Exorcist

 

‘Psych’ is back to its roots with this one. Funny lines galore, crisp editing and a fast paced storyline. It’s a throwback to the hay days of Season 2 in some ways, where characters simply had fun jumping from one procedural to the next and the emotional stuff didn’t seem to get in the way.

‘The Devil’s in the Details… and the Upstairs Bedroom’ is the latest in line of Psych’s homages to popular culture and its the cult movie, ‘The Exorcist’ which makes for fodder this time. Gus (Dule Hill)  and a reluctant, skeptic Shawn (James Roday) investigate a case of demonic posession at a Catholic university for their former Sunday School teacher, Father Weley played by Ray Wise.

This episode wins for showcasing one of the best guest star performances of all time. Ray Wise who played the slick and charming Devil himself in(the brilliant at first and then got really weird) ‘Reaper’, plays a man of God with the same panache and smoothness. His complete conviction in his beliefs is wonderfully balanced by his easy nature. A moment in case, where he jokes about how he likes to start every exorcism with a bit of humour.

The bit with Henry (Corbin Bernson) getting obsessed with Shawn’s Xbox was funny enough. The banter between Shawn and Gus was in full form with a full-fledged cat fight thrown into the mix. Since I haven’t seen ‘The Exorcist’, I am not sure how good or bad it was in spoofing it. But independent of that,the whole gig was very cleverly done, complete with the whole ‘tounges’ and ’spiderwalking’ cliches of posession. There were many other singular funny moments in the show like the running jingle joke, and the  digs at FaceBook. It should probably be weird that one episode makes  so many unconnected references like talking about ‘Run Lola Run’ and ‘When Harry met Sally’ in a take on ‘The Exorcist’, but ‘Psych’ always manges to do it successfully.

Talking Movies: Vintage Celluloid

August 9, 2009 at 5:39 pm | In Entertainment, Society, Talking Movies, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Purple Rose of Cairo: Blurring the lines betwen fiction and life

Purple Rose of Cairo: Blurring the lines betwen fiction and life

‘The Purple Rose of Cairo’ has got to be one of the charming movies I’ve ever come across.  It’s quaint flow and child-like simplicity can easily lull us into thinking of it like yet another romantic comedy.  But ‘Purple Rose…’ is much like a warm breeze, that floats about unobtrusively and yet you can’t feel unaffected by it.

Directed by Woody Allen in a deceptively simple and comedic narrative, the movies tells the story of  Cecilia played by Mia Farrow, a working class woman in an unhappy and abusive marriage who finds respite from the depression and grueling life in the glamorous movies that she watches every week at the local theatre. The more real life presses upon her, the more she escapes into the soothing darkness of talkies. It is during her fifth viewing of  ‘The Purple Rose of Cairo’  that a character from the movie  Tom played by Jeff Daniels  jumps out of the movie screen claiming to have fallen in love with her. While panic ensues all around, Cecilia spends a day out of the dreams with Tom.  Meanwhile, Gil Sheppard, the actor who plays the character of Tom runs into Cecilia in the hopes of finding his errant on-screen alter ego and bringing him back. An odd love triangle follows with both the actor and the character having fallen for her forcing Cecilia to choose while having to contend with her irate husband ( Danny Aiello)

‘The Purple Rose of Cairo’ explores some interesting themes.  It breaks the fourth wall both ways by having Tom travel into the real world and also Cecilia going into the movie.  The other characters in the movies, find themselves lost without the presence of  Tom and the momentum of the script to keep them going. They end up arguing with the audience, jumping into each other’s scenes and going off-page. The movie made in 1985 is set in the era of the depression. The starkness of the country and Cecilia’s own conditions forms a bleak contrast to the glamorous movies that she likes to lose herself in. This lends a bitter-sweet tone to the movie where while one is amused at the premise of the storyline it becomes evident that it isn’t quite a fairy tale romance. This further gets elucidated in the way that Tom fails to understand real world problems like lack of money or jobs.

The perfection of cinema that is seen on screen is juxtaposed with the selfish and egoistic side of Hollywood. Tom, the on-screen character is sweet, considerate and devoted to Cecelia while the actor who plays him is self-absorbed and arrogant. Even though he’s perfect for her, Tom’s naivety leads Cecilia to choose Gil Sheppard on account that he was from the real world. A choice she regrets in the end when she leaves home to go away to Hollywood with him only to find he’s left without her.  The climax finds Cecilia alone in the theatre watching yet another movie after which she would most likely return to her abusive husband.

 

Intelligible Television: Why ‘Psych’ is Awesome..Period!

August 8, 2009 at 10:43 pm | In Entertainment, Intelligible Television, Shows, Television, Uncategorized | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Shawn and Gus chase after an elusive art thief in the 4th season premiere of Psych

Shawn and Gus chase after an elusive art thief in the 4th season premiere of Psych

 

Sometimes, I am extremely tempted to make my blog all about television. It’s so much fun to write about and strangely therapeutic. It takes all the fan-girlishness out of me and channels it into something a bit more structured and coherent. And when my obsession with a show reaches the disturbing levels as it has with ‘Psych’, I almost think it’s necessary to express it in a way that is more than random squealing.

If you don’t already know, ‘Psych’ which airs on USA network is a dramedy about Shawn: a slacker with photographic memory and keen observation who pretends to be a psychic and solves cases along with his friend Gus. While it might be only be the zillionth procedural  you don’t watch Psych for the mystery. Not really. You watch it for the absurd and hilarious shenanigans, for the best bromance to have ever been seen on TV after ‘Scrubs’, for obscure Eighties references and for writing of a level that is brilliant and slapstick at the same time.

So after what seemed like forever (to me and my Twitter buddies. I am pretty sure the six month time space continuum passed pretty much like six months for the rest of the universe), the quirky crime-fighting duo of Shawn and Gus finally made it back on our screens for the fourth season. But not from sunny Santa Barbara where the show is set at , but the snowy peaks of British Columbia, Canada.  The season premiere titled ‘Extradition : British Columbia’  finds Shawn ( James Roday) and Gus ( Dule Hill)  off to a ski vacation in Whistler which gets  disrupted with an international  art thief , Pierre Despereux played by Cary Elwes of  ‘The Princess Bride’ fame showing up in town whom Shawn recognizes from Lassiter’s wall of most wanted.  Pretending to be Head Detective to solicit the local police’s help, Shawn attempts to nab Despereux with Lassiter (Tim Omundson) and Juliet (Maggie Lawson) flying down to assist.  What follows is an entertaining forty minutes complete with a dig at the ’The Mentalist’, the standard Canada joke or two, talking to raccoons, An ‘Entrapment’ laser spoof and some less than stellar skiing on part of the guys all of which is rounded off nicely with an adorable, aww worthy non-date between Shawn and Jules. 

Lassiter’s frustration at not being able to have a gun and exude his usual authority, being out of his jurisdiction is amusing as is Cary Elwes’ portrayal of the gentleman criminal as he speaks in clipped tones and wears designer loafers.  As fans of the show would know, the show is actually filmed in Vancouver where it does a decent job of masquerading as being set in California. With the need to pretend obviously not there in this particular episode,  panoramic shots of popular tourist destination like the Capilano Bridge and Stanley Park and the city skyline have been added gleefully for the simple fact that they can be shown.

As far as season premieres go, even without the staple dead body, ‘Extradition: British Columbia’ doesn’t disappoint. It delivers it’s signature blend of humor and wit while successfully addressing some of the developments in Season 3 namely Shawn’s attempts at rekindling romance with high school crush Abigail (Rachael Leigh Cook) and the interesting twist it has for the Shawn and Juliet storyline. Season 4 finds the fake psychic attempting to negotiate a fledgling relationship with Abigail while reconciling with the abruptly changed dynamic of his little more than friendship with Juliet. Roday brings out some unseen nuances to the character of Shawn as he awkwardly and endearingly fumbles through conversations wiht Juliet  before oh so sweetly proclaiming  to refuse to be uncomfortable around her, because she means too much to him.  Maggie Lawson too does well at keeping Juliet non-dramatic and composed.  Episode writer and show creator Steve Franks thankfully keeps out any exaggerated heartbreak or pining  from weighing in upon the lightness of the show.  While I must admit, the shipper in me was less than thrilled about yanking the flirtatious element between the two characters, there is a new and heightened awareness of feelings for each other which is sure to lend to the depth of the show.

All in all, ‘Extradition..’  sets the tone perfectly for season ahead.

Discount Art for the Connoisseur in you

August 2, 2009 at 11:55 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,

          nano-pic-087

 

Art which is without boundaries: that is the idea behind ‘Daira’ explains Atika Amjad pointing out the open ended circle which comprises the logo and reminds us that our limitations are only as confining as we let them to be.

 

Started in 2001 by two sisters, Atika Amjad and Atya Amjad, Daira is an eight year old gallery that has become a fixture of  Hyderabad’s cultural landscape. After a successful show earlier this year in March titled ‘Art in Object’ an innovative exhibit of how art can be functional, Daira brings for lovers of art, its latest project ‘The Nano Show’: A thirty day exhibit of one Ft by one Ft small format paintings by 23 artists priced at Rs 1000 each.

 

Inspired from the Tata Nano, the project seeks to make art more affordable and viable for all stake holders: the gallery, new artists and clients. “To make art a necessity and not a luxury.” proclaims Atika Amjad, owner of the Gallery. Gone are the days when one had to be familiar with the names of Rembrandt or Van Gogh to be considered worthy of appreciating art. While the ‘investment’ interest the market  saw a couple of years ago may not be a stellar example, the changing aesthetics of the Indian middle class accompanied by the availability of disposable income has made collecting art more than a passion of the elite. Why then settle for generic prints and common place wall hanging when you can buy an original piece of art?

 

Atika Amjad who conceptualized the exhibit said the whole things were executed in less than two months. “We approached a few artists, mostly fresh out of college or in their final years. 23 artists from all over Andhra Pradesh  have showcased their pieces. This is an ongoing project. More artists are going to be featured from Kerala, Delhi, Lucknow, Baroda etc.  The profit will come from the volumes sold. So far the response has been over whelming.”

 

Atika is quick to point out that the reduced price has not meant a proportionate reduction of quality. “Artists were interviewed and selected on the basis of their future plans for personal growth. They were invited to come and discuss the works to be showcased.’

 

The exhibit is an eclectic mix of all styles brought together by the common thread of their small size format. From objective, abstract, landscapes, interior and exteriors to Indian ink and sculpture, the potential client has an array of work to choose from. The paintings again address several themes from ones as simple and lucid as memories of college to feminist interpretations on Indian ink by Swati K to a refreshing look at the city of Hyderabad in the works of Kota Lakhsmi Narayan. Over 70 % of the paintings have already been sold and some artists have even sold all twelve of their collection and have even come out with a second set of works to acquiesce popular demand.

Following this show which comes to an end on the 4th August, Daira will be presenting ‘Royal Dictate’ by artist Masuram Ravi Kant, a royalty theme event cum exhibition of works on the 6th of August, 2009.

Notes from my Treadmill

April 15, 2009 at 6:15 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

criamoda-fitness31

The wonderful thing about living on a university campus is that you have the space for a lot of outdoor activity. It’s really nice to be able to step out of your home into the woods and take off on long walks or cycle to the lake. While I enjoy doing those things, I also get to enjoy a more consistent and rigorous workout at the campus gym which is freakin’ amazing considering it’s free. Over the year I’ve been going to the gym I’ve sort of come up with a regime that suits my needs and here a few pointers from my calorie burning missions.

The only motivation for exercise shouldn’t be losing weight. If you concentrate all your energies on that aim, it becomes more than often a frustrating endeavour and you’re likely to give up very soon. That’s because it’s always important to understand that weight loss is a gradual process no matter what the home shopping people will tell you. Setting your weight targets is a good thing and gives you focus, but make sure you appreciate the other benefits of exercise. It’ll increase your stamina, tone your muscles and make you feel energetic. Don’t be disillusioned if you don’t have the curves or the abs you were looking for right way, because exercise makes other positive changes to your body. You will love the way your posture improved, and leaner and stronger limbs.

Finding something that works for you is important. Don’t get taken in by what’s fashionable right now, or promises quick results. Clichéd as it may sound, everybody is different so make sure you pick a form a exercise that fits your schedule, makes you feel good and you enjoy doing. The key is to like what you do, whether it’s organized exercise, sports or yoga or a combination of things. Always start out slow and then increase the intensity as you go along. Keep pushing yourself to achieve more out of your time at the gym.

Buddies are not just for swimming. Working out together with your friend, sibling or significant other is twice the amount of fun and helps you stick to your workouts. Find someone you can work out with. This way you’ll have someone who’ll be in the same boat as you, getting the same joint aches and the urge to just curl up and go to sleep sometimes in the middle of cardio.

Invest in gym wear, it’s worth it. Buy yourself some comfortable and stylish track pants and t-shirts. Looking good makes all the difference. That doesn’t mean you have to blow away tons of cash on expensive Adidas and Reebok gym wear. You can get affordable gym wear from Urban Yoga and West Port. Shop during clearance sales. Urban yoga clothes are especially good for the summers because they are completely sweat absorbent and keep you very dry.

 

Get a good beat working for you

Get a good beat working for you

One of the things that helps me workout is music. It gives you a beat and rhythm to work out to instead of a boring count of 1, 2,3. Compile a ‘gym mix’ of songs that you like and order them in a way that synchronizes with your workout. Ex- Fast beats for cardio and running, rock for weights and lounge music for yoga. If you can make it work, you can try listening to an audio book while you work out as well. Suggestions for a good gym play list include Beyonce, Britney Spears, Sean Paul, DMC, techno, trance etc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

It’s important to remember, working-out is not a panacea for health. Always remember to eat right. Avoid junk, high sugar and empty calorie foods and snacking between meals. Trust me, the momentary pleasure you’ll get out of them is so not worth it. Crazy dieting or starving doesn’t help either. If you’re going on a diet, make sure you’ve done your research to meet your food group requirements.

Never let excuses of lack of time or facilities keep you from trying to be fit. You can achieve a good workout in as less as twelve minutes a day. If you can’t afford or make time for a gym, take brisk walks, go running and research for equipment sans exercises on the web that you can do at home on your own.

 

Look Who’s on Twitter!

April 11, 2009 at 4:11 pm | In Entertainment, Media, New Media, journalism | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

The Twitter Brower: flowingdata.com

 

Obama is on it, so is Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore, Vanessa Hudgens, Ryan Seacrest, Tina Fey, Robert Pattinson and a lot of other important and less important people.  Who needs paparazzi to tell us what celebs are up to when they can do it themselves in 140 characters or less at that. When Shakespeare said ‘Brevity is the soul of wit’, You know now he was talking about Twitter, the micro-blogging service where you can find people posting updates, networking, promoting, looking for jobs, getting fired from jobs and having fun sometimes. There are even fictional characters like Shawn Spencer from USA’s Psych twittering online.  

I joined Twitter many months ago out of sheer curiosity and then let my account gather dust. It seemed so silly to keep posting updates about what I am doing to a bunch of strangers. But in a vague moment of boredom a few weeks ago, I made a post and pretty soon, I realized I liked it. Now I make an average of three posts a day sometimes two in ten minutes. I think for the first time, I would stick to a social networking site after the initial enthusiasm wears off. 

My past experiences with the social networking scene have not impressed me to the degree, where I could think of it the way a lot of journalists do. Orkut was fun till it got mildly creepy with pretty much anyone and everyone wanting to be your friend for no visible reason. The ‘frandship’ requests alone were enough for me to renounce my account with little regret. Plus I’d found Facebook by then and it seemed like a classier and more private alternative to being on Orkut. But then it became so over loaded with features, that you dreaded logging in, lest someone had challenged you to  some inane game  or quiz that didn’t make sense to begin with. It’s become the legitimate spam portal where anyone can push anything into your face.  The only reason I am still on it is because I love my friends and I have to find some way of keeping in touch with them.  Plus it’s sort of uncool not to be on it, even if I check my account like say once in three months.

Twitter is like the ultimate no frills Facebook. It is less complex, more creative and definitely cooler.  It’s fun to think of the mundane daily activities in the form of witty, staccato sentences, and I think that’s really what people enjoy a lot more than the connectivity. Co-founder of Twitter, Biz Stone was on The Colbert Report the other night, and he said “Twitter is like the messaging service, we didn’t know we needed.”  I have to agree, since it is exactly the kind of messaging service I’ve been looking for. Free, fast and done through a key board.

More than the technical features of Twitter, it is the social dynamic which is more interesting.  Why do we take so much trouble to worry about our privacy and then write about what time we got up or where we’re gonna go for dinner? It’s almost like most of the time; we’re trying to make our lives appear more interesting than it actually is or just making a performance out of things, because there is a hypothetical audience out there for it, reading about us. 

It’s probably the reason why there are so many celebrities on Twitter, after years of telling the media to leave them alone that too. Biz Stone says its because Twitter is a simple and quick way of controlling information about yourself and that’s why it attracts so much Hollywood traffic. Plus it also acts like an improvisation of word-of mouth in a way, allowing you to promote stuff as well and create a closer bond with the fans.  My Space and Blogs require a different kind of structure of information and moderation which they may not have the time or inclination for.

Micro blogging has been around for some time now and Twitter takes it to a whole new level by bridging it with cell phone activity and that’s probably appealing to a lot of users, given the number of special applications cell phones have come up with to facilitate Twitter on cell phones.  Android came up with Twitteroid. Adobe has come up with TweetDeck to bridge Twitter with Facebook, a web application that I am trying out right now and liking.

I don’t know whether to get too excited about it all, because a lot of good things on the web have taken a turn for the worse, simply because they became too popular for their own good. I hope the same doesn’t happen with Twitter.

 

 

 

 

 

How Technology can Breed Complacency

March 31, 2009 at 9:20 pm | In Media, New Media, journalism | 1 Comment

Posted for the TNTJ  March Debate on what traditional skills are we losing?

For some time now, new media has been heralded as the second coming of journalism worldwide. Everybody marvels at RSS news feeds and tweets and blogs, and celebrates the slow death of the newspaper. While this immense explosion of web journalism is something that is phenomenal for many reasons, it has its pitfalls.

One of the primary issues with new media journalism is credibility. Even as more and more people are turning to the web for independent news and commentary, the question of credibility does give them pause. Who is this random blogger who reports from his or her community and why should I take his/her word?

It’s a shortcoming that web journalists have been trying hard to overcome, and have succeeded partially. Perhaps the fact that bloggers are getting more recognition as good journalists will help the case.

In a way it’s related to the loss of a few traditional news gathering skills. The technology available to journalists have led them to circumvent any real field work, or face to face interaction. While this is completely justified given the short deadlines they work under, its given rise to a lot of surface scratching and incomplete research, where we’re only as knowledgeable on a subject as Google allows us to be.

The visible amount of carelessness that creeps into a lot of writing on the web in terms of typos, incorrect or lack of attribution, grammar and rudimentary editing is another reason why web journalism lacks the kind of credibility that print or television enjoy. Good and accurate writing is not as dismissible as many think just because it’s on the web. It’s a serious issue which bloggers should ideally take note of and pay attention to.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.